Currently not on view
Loch Katrine,
1844
More Context
Handbook Entry
Talbot invented one of the two initial photographic processes that debuted before the public in 1839. Whereas his French counterpart, Louis-Jacques Mandé Daguerre, arranged for a lifetime government annuity for putting the metal-plate daguerreotype process in the public domain, Talbot obtained a patent for his own paper-based process, the calotype (from the Greek <em>kalos</em>, or beautiful) — the template for every negative-to-positive, multiple-print method that ensued. Depending on minute chemical variations, the tones of a calotype range in character from rich purples to tawny browns — colors that serendipitously recall the appearance of fine printers’ inks and aquatint effects. To demonstrate the utility of his invention for publishing, Talbot helped to found a photographic printing establishment at Reading and issued, for sale by subscription, the serial <em>The Pencil of Nature</em> (1844) and, a year later, a twenty-three-print album, <em>Sun Pictures in Scotland</em>. <em>Loch Katrine</em>, an autumnal view in the latter folio, showcases some of the picturesque effects — paper grain, soft focus, and graphic contrast — that led one pious supporter to prefer the calotype to the daguerreotype, seeing in it "the imperfect work of man . . . and not the much diminished perfect work of God." e
Information
1844
Europe, Scotland, Loch Katrine
-
Graham Smith, "Views of Scotland", in <em>Henry Fox Talbot: Selected Texts and Bibliography</em>, ed. Mike Weaver (Boston: G.K. Hall, 1992)., pp. 117–124
-
"Acquisitions of the Art Museum 1998," <em>Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University </em>58, no. 1/2 (1999): p. 86-123., pp. 103–104
-
<em>Earth's beauty revealed: the nineteenth-century European landscape</em>, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Art Museum, 2002).
-
<em>Princeton University Art Museum: Handbook of the Collection</em> (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), 331 (illus.)
-
<em>Princeton University Art Museum: Handbook of the Collections </em>(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Art Museum, 2013), p. 349
Share your feedback with us
The Museum regularly researches its objects and their collecting histories, updating its records to reflect new information. We also strive to catalogue works of art using language that is consistent with how people, subjects, artists, and cultures describe themselves. As this effort is ongoing, the Museum’s records may be incomplete or contain terms that are no longer acceptable. We welcome your feedback, questions, and additional information that you feel may be useful to us. Email us at collectionsinfo@princeton.edu.